Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMPP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Glass  Cobra  17:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

HMPP

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn software package 10 GHITS, most from wikipedia or the developers Mayalld (talk) 13:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * keep and expand. There is no explanaton of the purpose or the mechanism of HMPP. Andreas  (T) 13:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Appears to do the same thing as OpenMP, right down to the #pragmas. Except, well, it's Better and you should Use It Instead. ~ Jafet Speaker of many words 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It is similar to OpenMP, but it is about GPGPU programming. --Jakub Narebski (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  02:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The first page of a Google test reveals only press releases and official company promotion, which clearly do not establish the notability of the software. Non-web sources are expected to be nonexistent given the lack of online sources, since this concerns a software product. ~ Jafet Speaker of many words 06:49, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I would expect any wiki article to direct me in such a way as to gain a basic understanding of the subject. I'm left completely baffled by this.  There are no inline citations, it appears to be solely about a commercial product, it does not discuss what is notable about this product.  The very first line doesn't actually make any sense.  Parrot of Doom (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Subject appears reasonably new and could become notable if it isn't already as it's a growing area. May be fixable? MediaMob (talk) 21:31, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice against re-creation if subject should become notable. But it isn't currently. RayAYang (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  14:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.