Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HMS Kirkliston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn as the copyvio template should have been used, and the reasons for the nomination are no longer present in the article. —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 06:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

HMS Kirkliston
Delete because the article appears to have always been a copyvio of, and seems that just pieces of that webpage were cut and pasted to create this article. Article as it stands doesn't seem to have an encyclopedic tone and creating it from scratch would be my suggestion. —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 19:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've radically trimmed the Kirkliston article to appear more like the articles on her sister ships HMS Bronington and HMS Belton. Don't know if that will help spare the article, but I've learned something from the exercise. --die Baumfabrik 22:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination. Baumfabrik's edits to the article have removed the problems with the article, and the reason for nomination. —TheJC (Talk • Contribs • Count) 09:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep &mdash; This probably should have been dealt with via the copyvio template. But the page looks okay now. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.