Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HM Kansal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

HM Kansal

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:RS. Does not seems to be notable as per wiki standards. Bharathiya (talk) 05:13, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

As you all know, that I created a page titled 'HM Kansal'. As some users have discussed about the references of the page being unreliable, I would like to know the reason behind the references not being good. It has almost been an year since this page was created & I as well as other members of Wikipedia have regularly added references to it. I have rechecked all the references provided and according to me, there are a sufficient number of sources to support this article. I went through the Wikipedia 'guidelines for creating a page' again and according to them, "at least one reliable source should be present to support the article". I definitely think that this article follows the Wikipedia rules. These are just my views. I would now like the suggestions of the users involved in this matter. I will still definitely try my best to provide some more suitable references for it. For the time being, removal of the deletion tag is my kind request and if not possible I request for some more time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicreator508 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 19:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Comment: None of the references confirm to the WP:RS, at present. We need multiple reliable sources as Primary and secondary references. -- Bharathiya (talk) 03:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails BIO. Around The Globe  सत्यमेव जयते 07:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another spambio. Ok, the guy may have some coverage in a non-English newspaper once, which they even scanned and posted here. Not convincing it passes WP:BIO. 21:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Notability not established. Looks like an ordinary businessman; none of his activities look notable. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 22:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.