Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HORTON (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

HORTON (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completely unnoteworthy software where the only information about it is on the github page, doesn't even pass a single sliver of notability whatsoever. The article is uncited, probably because it's impossible to cite it. The page is also written like an ad/promotion -- Tautomers (T C) 21:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Promotional and has exactly zero citations to reliable sources. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I am a retired Quantum Chemistry. Some programs in this field are notable. This one certainly is not. It has no reliable sources and I doubt any can be found. --Bduke (talk) 01:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.