Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

HQ Media

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lacks notability per WP:CORP Advocate (talk) 22:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per apparent lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources. Gr1st (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and WP:CORP.-- S R X  22:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -Company has multiple products available on Amazon (Osmonds' 50th Anniversary DVD, Untold Tales DVD). KT (primary article author) (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -Direct involvement with Osmonds seems notable. KT (primary article author) (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited - working with someone notable does not automatically confer that notability onto the other party. The more pressing problem here is that this is currently unverifiable - not even HQ Media's own website, never mind the wider web, mentions the Osmonds in connection with the company. Gr1st (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep -More references have been added. (Even more would be better still.) KT (primary article author) (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reference 7 (Adobe Design Achievement Awards) is the only one which hints at notability and has reliable third-party status. Even there I'm unsure how significant the awards scheme is. Gr1st (talk) 23:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete(for now) -The main issue here is lack of notability that can be readily verified by reliable third-party sources. There is currently not a sufficient amount of evidence to verify notability and warrant the article's place in Wikipedia's main namespace. I am not opposed to this article being closed for now, but I certainly would like to submit the article again at a later time, once I am sufficiently able to verify notability. I welcome suggestions from any useful users who can help out. (There is no need to userfy this article; I already have all the material from this article on the workspace on my user page.)  K EZIA  T AXT  16:49, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.