Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HR-XML Consortium Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

HR-XML & HR-XML Consortium Inc.
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )
 * – ( View AfD View log  •

)

A library of XML schemas and the organisation that develops them. No evidence of notability offered. HR-XML had a previous discussion three years ago with a "no consensus" result and there has been no improvement to the article since then. &mdash; RHaworth 07:44, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both. More back office minutiæ from the IT department: a library of XML  schemas developed by the HR-XML Consortium, Inc. to support a variety of business processes related to human resource management...  No showing of historical, technical, or cultural significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

[Romuald Restout] Comment on the request for deletion for HR-XML I respectfully disagree with the comment that HR-XML has no technical significance. HR-XML standards are widely used in the HR software field and in adjacent industries. Numerous organizations both for-profit and non-profit (including governmental organizations in Europe) have implemented those standards or are using it in some sort —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrestout (talk • contribs) 21:31, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Keep HR-XML Consortium article. Agree with above comment, HR-XML standards are widely used in the industry and amongst very notable organizations. Initial references have been added to the article, more to come. --Kmcdowell12 (talk) 20:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete both. Between them they manage one piece of (potentially) independent coverage. Searching doesn't find anything more. Falls a long way short of meeting WP:GNG. Nuttah (talk) 19:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.