Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HRH Princess of the Netherlands


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure).  Eliminator JR Talk  14:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

HRH Princess of the Netherlands

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete or Merge to her parents pages: Non-notable bio. Baby girl born on April 10, 2007 doesn't seem to be notable unless she does something notable. Tat Meng 03:14, April 12, 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, the subject is of royal blood - that alone is notable, as far as I can tell. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 03:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, her sisters have articles, and she is a royal princess. This article will be moved by Friday morning when her name is officially announced. She is notable because she is the daughter of the heir to the throne of the Netherlands, granddaughter of the queen, and will probably be future daughter of a King, and later, sister to a Queen. Morhange 03:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Major royal family members are certainly notable  Citi Cat  04:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - if the phrase "heir to the throne of " appears in an article, the person is probably notable. --Haemo 04:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. How do pages like this get proposed for deletion, anyway? I imagine the whole country is talking about her. StAnselm 04:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone else. Maxamegalon2000 05:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone else.--Prof.Thamm 07:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep HRH is the future daughter of a King and sister of a Queen, of course she is notable enough to have her own page. Idiotic to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.130.207.184 (talk • contribs)
 * Strong Keep - interesting socio-political nomination, which should have taken account of WP:notability first. Rgds, - Trident13 10:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, ridiculous nomination. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's also ridiculous that this baby gets so much attention, but since she does, she deserves an article. By the way, do we have a category or list of "people whose real name is unknown"? Then we could add her next to Jack The Ripper and similar creatures :-) . Fram 11:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - royal. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 13:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.