Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'procedural close. There are two AfDs currently open for this article and as the second has received more editor attention, I'm going to copy the data here and add it to the other AfD. The closure of this AfD is not meant to signify that the article should be kept or deleted and is only being done so the AfD discussion will be kept in one area as opposed to two concurrent AfDs. As they were both opened on the same day, this should not affect the admin decision unless it is closed early. Any further discussion should be held at Articles for deletion/HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak (2nd nomination). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article does not have any useful information and violates and should be deleted upon patent nonsense, under the Wikipedia deletion policy filed under A1 (patent nonsense) as it has no useful or relevant information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronjacksonjohn (talk • contribs) 01:32, 25 May 2014‎
 * Keep. as the reference links and articles points to a real incident. This has nothing to do with the patent-nonsense. - Abhilashkrishn (talk) 10:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: Real incident, referenced, and discussed in media. --Ragib (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: Its may real incident, but a lot of problem may happen out there. Its a country internal matter, let them solved it and this information dont have any other use beside political harassment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyscript (talk • contribs) 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not censored. It cannot be accepted working for the interest of specific people or country as per WP:NOTCENSORED - Abhilashkrishn (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 12:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.