Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTML-to-PDF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 23:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

HTML-to-PDF

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. No evidence of notability per WP:GNG. All references are primary. Snotty Wong  talk 04:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, non notable software with no independent sources. Sea photo Talk  05:09, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A worthy first try from a beginning editor and they've got my sympathy vote, however the notability just doesn't meet WP:GNG. There's really nothing outstanding about this particular piece of software to merit an encyclopedic article, and there's no secondary sources I could find to back it up either. The author did contest the prod telling us to refer to the talk page, but they have yet to write anything there. If they have a convincing argument in defense of keeping this then I'm interesting in reading it.. -- &oelig; &trade; 17:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the author's addition here is appropriate for software of this type and level of importance.   Snotty Wong   squeal 19:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. An interesting free product but brand new (initial release on April 2010) which gives a very limited time-frame to acquire independent coverage or encyclopedic value. Pxtreme75 (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.