Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTML5 in mobile devices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

HTML5 in mobile devices

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. The lead text simply says that HTML5 should work on desktop and mobile, but everything should work on desktop and mobile. Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Guy Macon (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - The has a lot more information and better asserts notability. I have also found papers like "Mobile development tools and cross-platform solutions" (IEEE Xplore) and "Cross-platform Mobile Applications with Web Technologies" that discuss HTML5 as an application development platform, that were not in the earlier version of the article. --Joshua Issac (talk) 18:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, there used to be a lot of information there. But much of that content is redundant / obsolete - there's lots of phrases like "Development is in the very early stages" and "improvements in HTML5 for forms could make life easier for mobile applications". peterl (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge. The current page has almost nothing in it, and could be merged back into the HTML5 page. peterl (talk) 00:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Miasma Eternal TALK 03:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge, as Peter1 says; insufficient sourcing to demonstrate the need for a standalone article. ——  Serial # 19:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.