Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HUMANWINE (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 07:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

HUMANWINE


Article was nominated for speedy deletion for non-notability and copyvio. The copyvio section was removed, and the band meets WP:MUSIC by containing "at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable" (Dresden Dolls' Brian Viglione). I'm moving this to AfD instead. No opinion. A ecis  Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 20:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the sole notable member is an "occasional" rotating member. And not everything that a notable person does is in and of itself notable. Guy (Help!) 20:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete fails WP:MUSIC scope_creep 21:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Failing WP:MUSIC is not a criteria for speedy deletion, please see WP:CSD for more information. hateless 01:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Can we speedy delete under db-band? Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  04:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not see the afore mentioned claim to notability. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  04:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Neutral Their website mentions they've won the "Best New Local Act" at the Annual Boston Music Awards. The Boston Globe has reported on this.  It has also given a review.  The Dallas Morning News has also given a review.  Multiple third-party non-trivial mentions in reliable sources = keep.  ColourBurst 04:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Oops, the two sources I mentioned are the exact same article. Switching to neutral until more sources are found.  ColourBurst 04:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The Kansas City Pitch and Boston's Weekly Dig have also written about them. That's the multiple third-party sources needed.  ColourBurst 04:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Just being mentioned in the papers does not satisfy WP:MUSIC Don't know if anyone can see the Factiva hits without logging in. I got ten, but they are not "non-trivial." A blurb about someone's clothing or a mention the band is going to perform does not suffice. What I need is proof of more than a local contest award. A major chart position or a national tour would be good. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  16:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment They're not just "being mentioned", they're the subject of the article. I think we're interpreting "trivial" differently.  I tend to interpret "trivial" as "the article's on another person or event and the subject of the article only gets two lines worth of mentions".  Notwithstanding the first Boston Globe article (which is something like 1000 words or so), one review is around 100 words maybe and the other around 300 words or so.  So my feeling is that there's enough verifiable content there to write an article.  ColourBurst 19:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.