Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HUMUS project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  No Consensus--- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus! 06:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

HUMUS project

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Speedy contested, elevating for discussion, but I believe it still fails notability. delete UtherSRG (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  -- UtherSRG (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - You're the one that declined the speedy. I appreciate that you followed up on it. With no comment on whether or not that was speedyable, it's a clear delete here. Needs at least some indication of notability. I could perhaps entertain a redirect to the department it's from, but I'd want a reference to verify that. Nobody's going to be searching for this if that source can't be found. Shadowjams (talk) 08:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * comment - Note this significance: The HUMUS project was a environmental model of national significance since it was the first such attempt to model environmental pollution from agricultural source and evaluate alternative practices to reduce agricultural (non-point source) pollution. The project involved the early use of national level Geographic Information Systems (GIS) datasets for such analysis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydrologist101 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

ab
 * Strong keep - Considering how much readily available scientific and governmental literature goes into explicit detail about this subject, deletion seems nonsensical at best. —  C M B J   01:45, 12 June 2010 (UTC)