Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HV 2255


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

HV 2255

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not all stars are notable, even if it's the "one of the largest." Google scholar search returns only references in tables, etc. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:48, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: only claim to notability is being a fairly large star. Probably, since values from other sources vary.  Otherwise, no specific studies of this star, only database and large catalogue entries.  Lithopsian (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.