Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HV 888


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of largest stars. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

HV 888

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage in literature and only exists on the basis of being a star with an extremely large radius. Does not meet WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer   15:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect: the star "HV 888" is mentioned in several studies of the LMC, although I don't think it satisfies the criteria for significant coverge. A redirect to List of largest stars should suffice for now. Praemonitus (talk) 19:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to List of largest known stars. This is one of the many articles created on the basis of a very large stellar radius, without concerning if they would meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
 * InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 21:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to List of largest stars. User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 00:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of largest stars as R to list entry: the star is currently not notable per WP:GNG/WP:NASTRO but is mentioned in the appropriate list. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 12:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.