Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HYT (watchmaker)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔  17:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

HYT (watchmaker)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no notablity and promotional Puccetto (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:12, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep per the two-page New York Times article cited. That's substantial coverage. And it's not the only source, for example. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete unless a major rewrite can be performed. "The engineers at HYT have felt entirely free to shatter limitations!" hardly sounds encyclopedic. Jsharpminor (talk) 02:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Candleabracadabra --ЗAНИA talk talk] 16:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Candleabracadabra - NY Times coverage & other coverage. Jersey92 (talk) 05:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.