Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ha Thanh Lich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 05:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Ha Thanh Lich

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indications that this artist meets the criteria of WP:MUSIC. According to one user on the WP:WikiProject Vietnam (see this thread there was an article on this subject on the Vietnamese Wikipedia, but it was deleted for lack of notability. I could find no sources in English, and apparently, readers of the Vietnamese Wikipedia could find no sources in Vietnamese.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:34, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  — WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as it stands. I'm not going to try searching for sources in Vietnamese, but would just comment about the three provided. The Vu Xuan Hung one is just a scan of something a couple of lines long, but the Khoi Nguyen one could be interesting if I knew what it meant - and who Nguyen is. Unfortunately, Nguyen appears to be nearly as common in Vietnamese people as Kim is in Korea. What I said about this article also applies to the Doi Moi one. I've no objection to scans provided either I can read them or they are accompanied by an accurate (or reasonably accurate) translation. The two World Showbix ones I reject. They both reek of 'press release', and are remarkably similar in style. YouTube, MySpace and Amazon are not reliable sources; although Amazon does indicate existence, it cannot indicate notability. Peridon (talk) 23:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.