Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haakonian Order


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Haakonian Order

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just an stubbish, in universe repetition of the plot of several episodes of Star Trek: Voyager. It is therefore duplicative and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Only sourced by "in universe" and fan sources. Too bad more time is not spent on real topics rather than fictional ones. Northwestgnome (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete One of many non-notable fan-created trek-related trivia. lk (talk) 16:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Minor fictional faction which has not received substantial coverage from sources independent of the subject. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 21:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- not much more I can add to the arguments already presented, except to say I agree entirely. This is nothing but a plot summary stub, there are no references to demonstrate significant coverage by independent sources. Reyk  YO!  22:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep in some capacity due to encyclopedic and out of universe information included in this notable article. -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 23:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, that does not present a suitable amount or type of notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * We obviously disagree, but I think it does. I would like to see if the bit about "Dune" can be sourced as that strikes me as relevant out of universe information.  I wonder if it would be possibile to ask the person who added that information?  -- Happy editing!  Sincerely,  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 02:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I would normally be inclined to keep an article based on some significant coverage in the star trek encyclopedia, but snippets provided in google books indicate that even the coverage there is trivial. Apart from that bit of coverage, there is not significant coverage from independent, reliable sources in order to meet the WP:GNG.  Even if sources, the aside about Haakonian being inspired by House Harkonnen is exceedingly trivial.  It might merit a mention in the House Harkonnen article...maybe. Protonk (talk) 07:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.