Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habbo Paper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete HappyCamper 03:07, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Habbo Paper
NN, D. ComCat 00:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep verifiable. &hearts;&hearts;purpl  e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  01:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * My own website is verifiable too, but that alone doesn't mean it should have its very own article in an encyclopedia. Policy states this too. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Aha - that old strawman... Come on, surely you can do better. Trollderella 15:59, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable.  Starry Eyes  01:37, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete, and wasn't this on AfD already recently? (perhaps under a different name..) &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * No. But see  and . Uncle G 01:56, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete completely non-notable. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable...--Isotope23 02:09, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable per aboveNewyorktimescrossword 05:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Habbo-cruft. &mdash; J I P | Talk 09:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, Self-promotional/vanity Dxco 10:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Forum vanity. Perhaps it can be a link in Habbo Hotel if it contains some relevant information. - Mgm|(talk) 10:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per everyone. - Just zis Guy, you know? 14:24, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable--Jishnu--Jishnua 14:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. not noteable &mdash;Wayward Talk 14:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete gah. Certainly not notable. Janet13 20:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --TantalumTelluride 20:36, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the article but merge content into Habbo Hotel. This particular fansite is not worthy of its own article. --TantalumTelluride 20:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. Nominator made no effort whatsoever to support this nomination. Bryan 00:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed my vote in more depth, as I promised elsewhere, and this one's staying "keep". The article claims a million hits, nothing to sneeze at, and none of the votes cast so far have provided a basis for the claim that this isn't worth an article. What's the point of just saying "non-notable" over and over again? Or worse, someone saying "non-notable" and then someone else saying "what he said"? There's no content here. Bryan 05:21, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I just wikified the article and added a link to the website. How anyone could vote without doing that I really dont know. How can you know if its non notable without any links in the article? Justinc 09:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * del. does not satisfy wp:v. enceph  alon  10:20, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: one of many fansites for an indeed-notable website: nothing appears to distinguish it from the others. It is already listed on Habbo Hotel so maybe some of the information should be merged there. —Phil | Talk 13:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious. Gamaliel 18:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.