Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Ahmad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp  💬  14:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Habib Ahmad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. No credible citations are available. ScottHastie (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ScottHastie (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ScottHastie (talk) 10:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: the article is a biography, it has nothing to do with WP:NCORP. Being a professor and VC at a national university, he likely passes WP:NACADEMIC, which supercedes GNG. Also, someone should look into nominater's contributions, specially the reckless AfD participation. TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 10:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. He is a person, so NCORP is not relevant. From his google scholar profile with an h-index of 32 he easily meets WP:NACADEMIC criteria 1 (and possibly other criteria as well).--Eostrix (talk) 11:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. The case for WP:PROF is borderline, but as head (vice-chancellor) of an over-100-year-old major institute of higher education (apparently a significant public university in Pakistan despite the "college" name), he appears to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.