Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Construction Services


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Habib Construction Services

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability here. All the refs are own web-site and article editing history has blocked editors and what look like block evading editors. No trace of WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 08:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I made found several trivial mentions, , , , but every other source was simply a home website or business listing. Fails GNG per nom. Yvarta (talk) 11:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Because what it needs is improvement not deletion. It is one of the Pakistan's top construction companies. -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 16:08, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Because citation for this page is improving. This page is a source of information for many people around the world as this company is Pakistan's leading infrastructure construction company. August 15, 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Habib Construction Services Limited (talk • contribs) 11:26, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  — Habib Construction Services Limited (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep - because this page deserve improvement instead of deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitroeditor (talk • contribs) 11:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)  — Nitroeditor (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * A very easy and understandable mistake for newcomers to make, but note that votes on discussions like this are generally disregarded if the account name hints at a conflict of interest (COI). Users with COI are still highly welcome to contribute, but note that direct edits to a page you have a bias on can result in close scrutiny, and sometimes reversions. If the page is deleted, note it can re-uploaded later once new references and newspaper coverage have appeared, so don't fear that deletion is permanent. You can ask or a deleted page to moved to a draft as well, if you would like to work on it in an interim.Yvarta (talk) 18:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable and pure advertisement. Note to closing admin. There is a definite COI with one of the voters since the user name is the same as the article page. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  08:12, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and clear advertisement meant to promote the company.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:56, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.