Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Mousa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 21:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Habib Mousa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails in WP:FAILN and i cant find any sources in google after just 1 dead weblink inside article and it fails in WP:ORIGINAL Shadow4dark (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Shadow4dark (talk) 09:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Article literally has no sources and references.  Ashishkafle (talk) 09:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:BEFORE apparently missed these sources from Sweden:, , . Notability is based on the existence of sources, not the linking of those sources from the current article state and this artist has generated coverage in independent RS in his current home country. This includes an apparent nomination for a "Best of Sweden" award, and although I can't determine if the award grants notability itself, the existence of WP:SIGCOV is demonstrated by these cites. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Still lack of independence sources Shadow4dark (talk) 03:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:13, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep : there are available sources for the subject. Maco Paco (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , would you like to provide them for us? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not believe that SIGCOV is met: sources have to be both indepndent of the topic and providing depth of coverage, neither of which is the case. ——  Serial  16:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable --Devokewater</b> @  19:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.