Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Habib Sadeghi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 04:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Habib Sadeghi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article; possibly Conscious uncoupling is notable,but that doesn't show notability for the person claimed to have developed the technique under a different name. The content is a partial duplication of the Conscious uncoupling article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC) reformatted by Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I actually couldn't disagree with you more david, but I think it fails WP:PROMO the way the second half is written.  Obviously written by someone close to the doctor or just really buying into the mantra.  Paltrow actually gets enough in print that without the promo he could fly as a stub. Cheerio042 (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)  Striking blocked sock Britishfinance (talk) 10:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If you think you can add enough to show notability, wouldn't that be better?  DGG ( talk ) 04:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTPROMO. It may be that a properly NPOV article cold be written about this snake oil salesman, excuse me, "healer to the stars."  We are, however, not a free BILLBOARD.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:35, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - promotional tone is extremely concerning here, and there's not a lot to establish notability of the doctor himself.  Red Phoenix  talk  03:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.