Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacienda Solano Park, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hacienda Solano Park, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established with substantive sources. Per Articles for deletion/Desert Village Mobile Home Park, Arizona etc., etc., mobile home parks are not assumed to be notable. Reywas92Talk 20:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 20:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Unclear why you continue to recite nonsense about your mass-produced sub-stubs. This is a "subdivision...housing development...unofficial neighborhood" that makes up a third of Census Block Group 811700-3. Here's their website, the only source available on it, and it fails GNG, or do you care to show otherwise? Reywas92Talk 22:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, concur with nom. Satellite image confirms this is just a trailer park. As a development/neighborhood within Chandler, Arizona, this falls under bullet two of Geoland. Searching turns up routine real estate listings and similar, but no significant in-depth coverage on which to write an encyclopedic article. MB 22:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete it's a mobile home park per my newspapers.com search, and it's never significantly covered. Not a legally defined populated place ber WP:GEOLAND. It's a mobile home park here: The proof it's not notable is that it has a Chandler address in this tragic 1970s obituary here:  There are a number of these in the Phoenix area which need deletion. SportingFlyer  T · C  02:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:NGEO Lightburst (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - according to a source cited on the page, this is "not a census designated or incorporated place having an official federally recognized name." It appears to be a ordinary and small trailer park catering to senior citizens. News coverage is routine, and newspaper coverage is non-existent. Even assuming all the sources are reliable, there are between 50 and 100 residents of this development. That fails my standards. Bearian (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - just to correct some misconceptions regarding GNIS and whether or not they are a reliable source for this type of Gazetteer information. All the following information is taken directly from the USGS website (emphasis added is mine):


 * The U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) is a Federal body created in 1890 and established in its present form by Public Law in 1947 to maintain uniform geographic name usage throughout the Federal Government.


 * Decisions of the BGN were accepted as binding by all departments and agencies of the Federal Government.


 * It serves the Federal Government and the public as a central authority to which name problems, name inquiries, name changes, and new name proposals can be directed.


 * The GNIS Feature ID, Official Feature Name, and Official Feature Location are American National Standards Institute standards.


 * The database holds the Federally recognized name of each feature and defines the feature location by state, county, USGS topographic map, and geographic coordinates.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)


 * delete most trailer parks are not notable. There are probably exceptions to this general principle, but this place is not such an exception.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.