Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 (t&#124;c) 21:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hack!

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deprodded because of one review. I can't find any other sources, though Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 15:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Probably keep. If Rotten Tomatoes' link to this counts as 1, then the piece Dread Central counts as number 2. This can be found in addition to the 30 links at IMDB external reviews, of which some are bad, some are better. Geschichte (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, Rotten Tomatoes critic review, and Dread Central. Passes WP:NFILM  Donald D23   talk to me  19:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep Like others have noted it is linked by RT and many other sources.02:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supercopone (talk • contribs)


 * Keep Several reviews for this movie can be found online. Add a new section for Reception in the article itself. Jobie James (talk) 06:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.