Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hackey sack cricket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  18:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Hackey sack cricket

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NFT. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of Reliable sources and, thus, verifiability. It's possible that there is some notability here, but I don't see evidence of it. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 01:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete For all I know, this sport doesn't exist. It just isn't very good. If I get some evidence that it is anything, like notable, I will withdraw.TostitosAreGross (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that the external link added here is to an article created a few minutes earlier. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. First of all per WP:NFT. Second, that reference isn't even remotely a reliable source. EconomicsGuy (talk) 06:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.