Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadeel Qasim Hussein Al-Okbi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 17:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Hadeel Qasim Hussein Al-Okbi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

person apparently notable only for winning a relatively minor award - search does not find enough sources to support inclusion under GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 11:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:15, 8 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Weak keep Merge - I'm not 100% sure the Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize is very minor. If it isn't minor, it may satisfy criteria #1 of WP:ANYBIO. And even if it is minor, it is an international prize, and I would be very surprised if it were possible for someone to be awarded this prize and not be profiled elsewhere so as to meet GNG, even if mostly in Iraqi sources. Smmurphy(Talk) 22:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  08:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or Merge?
 * Weak delete & merge to Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize Smmurphy makes a good point about Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize, which seems to be reasonably selective (one person per year). But I couldn't find much coverage of it, and the coverage of the subject is limited solely to http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/14373349.Leading_Muslim_cleric_speaks_out_about_terrorism__President_Bashar_al_Assad_and_the_refugee_crisis/ (perhaps spelling of her name is a problem, but I don't know how to modify it). Overall, we have an article on an activist who received an award, and whose notability seems solely based on said award. As the award has borderline notability itself, I am afraid this seems on the bad side of notable. However, I think we could merge her bio to Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize, where each recipient can have their own paragraph. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 10:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've changed my !vote to merge. As a redirect to the individual's main claim to notability, this seems ok, especially if I am correct that the prize is not very minor. If/when the individual gains more notice, the article can be quickly renewed and improved. Smmurphy(Talk) 13:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ahmadiyya Muslim Peace Prize (no merge please) The prize itself has questionable notability and the significant coverage about the subject doesn't exist. I am against a merge as the information is already there in the target article and adjusted for WP:WEIGHT. Closing this as a merge essentially forcibly leaves a messy attribution redirect. Redirect is a much cleaner solution --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That sounds fine to me. I'm against delete then redirect, however, so as to keep the page history. Smmurphy(Talk) 13:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, my redirect !vote is specifically a redirect with history preserved. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.