Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haefely emc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Blanked by user.   De facto SNOW, implemented as G7. Jclemens (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Haefely emc

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Created in a promotional tone by a single purpose account, possibly a borderline case of WP:CSD. No sources are found in the article or on Google to prove that this is a notable company per WP:ORG - although, being founded in 1903, it may well be notable, which is why I'm bringing this here.  Sandstein  09:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


 * See also my discussion with the author, a company representative, at User talk:Sandstein.  Sandstein   10:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete--I agree with nominator. I can find no coverage whatsoever of this company anywhere, and notability isn't even really asserted in the article. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete By all accounts, it's just another company. 159 Ghits, none are news articles from reliable secondary sources. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedied per db-blanked; Martinyiap blanked the page.Bsimmons 666  (talk) Friend? 17:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.