Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haelan therapy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 08:08Z 

Haelan therapy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

200 Google hits, reads like advert, WP:BALLS Robin Johnson (talk) 14:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability; no sources; "therapy" developed by one person, nothing to show that it's widely used. Walton monarchist89 14:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Fang Aili talk 15:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable therapy. NawlinWiki 18:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - we should leave information about these questionable therapies here as a public service. --Curtis Bledsoe 2 03:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Second edit by this user name. Shyam  ( T / C ) 06:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * We have articles about notable "questionable" therapies like acupuncture and homeopathy. The problem with this one is that it's non-notable and pluggy - no sources, no Google presence, for either the therapy itself or the therapist (PhD, of course!) who made it up. And, if you can see past the meaningless buzzwords, no "information" at all. Robin Johnson (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, Shyam  ( T / C ) 06:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.