Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Haft
A poor dictionary definition that already exists on Wiktionary. No need to transcribe. Ifnord 15:09, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as dicdef. --Lockley 20:07, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom.Obina 23:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef. Please see WP:WWIN. Stifle 12:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.