Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hague Justice Portal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. @pple complain 09:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hague Justice Portal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotion for website. Ilse@ 17:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete, seems high-profile enough to be sourced, and it isn't easily merged with any single entity that it covers. The only thign I found in Google News Archive was this (from apparently tr. "Dutch Legal News"), which is pretty thin. If reliable sources could be found, this could be modified from its brochure status. --Dhartung | Talk 22:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as I have found and, being bold, added some cites and wikified the article. I think it now meets the Heymann standard. Bearian 01:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as improved. There is never anything wrong about improving an article under discussion at AfD. A better article and a keep is the ideal conclusion. DGG (talk) 05:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as improved and sourced. Well done.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, it's not often that a website is opened by a royal. John Vandenberg 05:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.