Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hahn Air Systems GmbH


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  20:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Hahn Air Systems GmbH

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Looks to be non-notable. EpicPupper (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:21, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: The sources in the article are sketchy: one is promotional, one is a broken link (at least for me), and the other is a Wikipedia article. Some (useless) routine coverage is available, see, , , . Looking to WP:GNG, these pieces ( and ) in industry publications could lift them over the bar. They are both independent, are written by staff writers, and rise to the level of secondary coverage by analysing the company's business model. Naturally, I've added them to the article. I'm not saying this is a case of obvious notability but I would have expected somewhat more source analysis from the nominator. Modussiccandi (talk) 10:37, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.