Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haidong Gumdo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Haidong Gumdo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has been tagged as unsourced for over 5 years. Even the external links are not independent. My search found no significant independent coverage of this martial art in any reliable source.Mdtemp (talk) 20:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment It seems a pity considering the effort that seems to have gone into the article. It looks like there should be more out there with respect to third party sources - but I also had trouble finding anything.  Still the name shows up in a number of websites.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Article has no independent sources. Don't know why it's listed under sportspeople when it's a martial art. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources. I found no supporting evidence to show the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.