Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NEVENT. The source provided doesn't discuss the conference, and a WP:BEFORE search yields no sign of the sort of "lasting significance" required for notability. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NEVENT --Shrike (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:NEVENT and even the WP:GNG. Good catch, Extraordinary Writ! gidonb (talk) 01:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Retain. I created that article 2014-02-09 and -10 with 11 references to articles in places like the New York Times, The Washington Post, The Times of Israel, Huff Post and Haaretz as well as Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) and others.  This strongly suggests it was notable.  The criterion WP:BEFORE includes, "Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted":  Credible sources are available to improve this article.  It now has only 1 reference.  The 10 that were deleted were credible sources saying important things about this conference. , cited in Reliability of Wikipedia notes that the best Wikipedia articles have many editors from a variety of perspectives.  This article on Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East suffered from not having enough editors with differing perspectives to prevent those 10 references from being deleted.  , also cited in Reliability of Wikipedia, said thad in controversial topics, "what is most remarkable is that the two sides actually engaged each other and negotiated a version of the article that both can more or less live with". Sadly, we didn't have the diversity of editors looking at this article needed to prevent those 10 references from being deleted.  However, that doesn't mean that this Conference wasn't notable.  Beyond this, I think the world needs an International Conflict Observatory.  The human psychology that drives conflicts and produces a need for  an International Conflict Observatory is summarized in Confirmation bias and conflict.  FYI, I just added a link from the Wikipedia article on the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to this article in the Haifa International Conference for a WMD-Free Middle East.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , None of the source mention the conference. So its not suitable to include and was rightfully deleted. Please read WP:OR and WP:NEVENT --Shrike (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails NEVENT with lack of sources on the conference itself. 11Fox11 (talk) 06:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.