Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hainault depot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience  t 00:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hainault depot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep It seems easy to find sources such as Reconstructing London's Underground and Hainault Depot 65 Years Old and All Systems Go!. Andrew D. (talk) 11:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The current status of this article is a stub. I always thought the purpose of a stub was to give people a chance to add to it and hopefully one day soon that will happen. As a writer of several engine shed articles I would be saddened to see one disappear.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 20:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Feel free to expand it! Meatsgains (talk) 20:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not sure if I have much reference material on this particular depot!--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I too had a tough time finding information. Meatsgains (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There is some information on the Hainault station page which I think could be shared onto the depot page or perhaps de;lete the depot page and put it as a sub-section on the station page. Several smaller depots are so treated.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. There appears to be sufficient information available to create a reasonable article and to establish notability. I'll note that I restored some sourced information that was removed by an IP (with the erroneous claim it was "jargon") immediately before the AfD was created. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that. The information was removed right before I put the page up for AfD. The content is sourced too, which helps. Meatsgains (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - Please keep and expand this page as found it very useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.43.231.187 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 28 December 2015 (copied from talk page)
 * WP:ITSUSEFUL. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a history section, referenced to four reliable sources, and might get to do a bit more as and when. Bob1960evens (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.