Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hairline Illusions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hairline Illusions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. All sources provided were either self-published or trivial. Joja lozzo  15:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, no indication of notability, very likely not notable. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  15:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC).  Followup:  As of 17:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC) I checked through all versions including the the "pre-gut" version below and found no versions worthy of keeping and little hope that this organization meets Wikipedia's notability requirements.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  17:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - An apparent WP:PROMO piece, sourced almost exclusively to WP:SPS sources or promotional materials (which generally don't have the information they are being cited for). Only Gnews hits are this and this article on microcredit that uses the company as an example. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, lacking in information and sources. Hint of WP:PROMO in the style of the writing.Inthepubliceye (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Albeit, there was a bit more content and several sources before I gutted it due to very poor source quality. Joja  lozzo  16:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hairline_Illusions&oldid=550431730 pre-gutted version] as well as all other versions that follow should be considered for salvage-ability and rescue prior to deletion. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  17:42, 15 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: I'm not sure on the procedure for bundling AFDs, but the article Egypt Lawson, on the proprietor of this establishment, should be bundled in here. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That article is up for PROD. If you want to de-PROD it and "bundle" the AFD, the "cleanest" way is to ignore all rules and "close" this AFD with "close for administrative reasons, will be re-listed as part of a multiple-article AFD" and start over.  In the new AFD put a comment linking back to this AFD.  If you are not an administrator put "(non-administrator closing this AFD)" before or after the text above.  Another option is to just start a whole new AFD for just her and put comments in both AFDs linking to each other. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  16:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No longer relevant, as Egypt Lawson has been speedily deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.