Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Higdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Hal Higdon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to fail WP:NWRITER. Sources given are the subject's website, a press release, a local news article written by the subject, etc., etc. Ploni (talk) 02:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Ploni (talk) 02:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, he's a running genius.  Article is/was a mess but he's notable. I added NYT and Runners' World. Will come back to this if time allows during the AfD. If I don't, can closer please draftify this for me? I can clean it up. Star   Mississippi  03:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - material provided by Star Mississippi above seems to push things into the notable side. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:05, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject is notable and sources added would establish/have established that. Maybe the lead and wording can be fixed to highlight why he is notable rather than what he has done most recently. IrishOsita (talk) 02:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.