Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Lawton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 08:12, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hal Lawton

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails GNG requirements, lacks coverage CeltJungleSnake (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CeltJungleSnake (talk) 07:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:40, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Featured on many reputed magazines. A quick google search shows plenty of results. Seems an easy pass for WP:GNG. Hypogaearoots (talk) 07:47, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep He has covered in The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fortune. Celtsbosom (talk) 07:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for WP:UPE. MER-C 14:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Celtsbosom and Hypogaearoots. Powerful Karma (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - likely undisclosed paid-for spam. MER-C 14:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Has done some cleanup and improvements to the page as the original author created a promotional piece. I guess it should qualify now as WP:NBUSINESSPERSON as the CEO of a Fortune 500 company. Strong passage of GNG with coverage in several RS including Forbes, NYTimes, WSJ, Business Insider, CNN, and Fortune to name a few. Hypogaearoots (talk) 08:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per new improvements. Satisfies GNG and NBUSINESSPERSON for notable roles. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 05:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above, plenty of sources available to meet WP:GNG and a Fortune 500 company CEO with good secondary coverage. GooeyMitch (talk) 09:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Satisfies GNG has multiple indepth coverage in reliable sources. Peneplavím (talk) 03:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.