Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Movius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 13:39, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hal Movius

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no third-party sources, has unclear notability, and appears to exist primarily for link-spam and puffery. —me_and 16:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I've now removed the majority of the linkspam; you can see it if you look here, before I started editing. —me_and 16:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete As best I can tell, fails the citation requirements of WP:PROF C1 (he doesn't have that many articles and psych is a very prolific field, so this is no surprise). He does not appear much in press, or get quoted that much as an authority, failing WP:BIO and WP:PROF C7. I do not see other grounds for claiming notability for this subject. Ray  Talk 18:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not yet apparent. Probably too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC).
 * Delete as promotional and failing WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 15:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.