Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halaliel, Archangel of Mercy and Guardian of the Path

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied by Starblind Closing. -- Essjay ·  Talk 03:20, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Halaliel, Archangel of Mercy and Guardian of the Path
Any article which begins this &hellip; should not be changed by anyone other than myself invites immediate action. A massive personal rant by someone who thinks he is an archangel. No encyclopedic content. -- RHaworth 13:12:07, 2005-08-10 (UTC)
 * Wow. That's quite a bit of ranting.  Delete it before it spreads.  --Several Times 13:39, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy. Given its extreme length and equally extreme incoherence, it could probably be speedied as either nonsense or vandalism.  Certainly not an attempt at an encyclopedia article by any stretch of the imagination, nor could it be turned into one. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:12, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Further note: considering the "This is a book authors note it should not be changed by anyone other than myself" part, it could be reasonably deduced that the author didn't fully understand the aspects of the GDFL they were getting themselves into by posting.  This would bring it into copyvio territory. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:15, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete speedily, as nonsense. Tonywalton 15:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense, though I was tempted to suggest a Transwiki to Wikibooks, as this is a marvelous work of abstract fiction. I fixed the spaces at the beginnings of many paragraphs to increase readability. -- BD2412 talk 15:43, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete --Dysepsion 17:01, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Kill it with Fire, speedily if possible. This is, quite simply, the weirdest thing I've ever encountered on Wikipedia. Not encyclopedic, irredeemably POV, unverifiable, nonsensical, and an attempt to communicate, all in one. android  79  17:21, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * You missed Vanity, Android. The guy is claiming to be an archangel. At least he isn't promoting a website.... Tonywalton 17:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's not technically vanity since the guy actually believes he is an archangel. ;-) android  79  17:47, August 10, 2005 (UTC)


 * Crucify --Doc (?) 18:17, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, with 5 explicit speedy votes, 3 deletes that could be interpreted as speedy votes, and zero keeps, I consider this enough consensus to speedy it. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  18:30, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of self-proclaimed deities. Or just Delete.  Allegrorondo 18:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.