Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Denise Laundrie (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Haley Denise Laundrie
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable university student that fails WP:NMODEL. Original article was cookie cutter (maybe bot) generated by a now banned SOCK as part of a big link building effort. Updates include a couple WP:ROUTINE local person wins award mentions in local news and a pageant focussed site of questionable sourcing (appears broken on my screen). An attempt to redirect to the article on the contest as usually is done with these articles after discussion was reverted with a misleading edit summary so it gets an AfD. Legacypac (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - only quality resources is WP:ROUTINE. Jeremiah (talk) 18:41, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - If she wins Miss USA, then perhaps it can be revisited. -- Whpq (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This article subject has already won titles in two different years and now also will be in the Miss USA a major pageant. There are several reliable sources cited including two different newspapers. It certainly is not the norm as the nominator suggests that that these state pageant winners  are redirected to the state pageant "after discussion"  There was no discussion on the talk page article or anywhere else that I am aware. This article subject achieves notability and passes WP:GNG     WordSeventeen (talk) 02:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.