Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half Baked Beans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus after relisting  DGG ( talk ) 04:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Half Baked Beans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. One of the many sources in the article is independent but that is a trivial mention (the company founder is quoted briefly) - the rest of the sources are company listings or press releases (including slightly rewritten press releases). Book reviews of books published by the company don't count towards notability, promotional material even less so. bonadea contributions talk 07:29, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. I see maybe 1 source that I would use, the rest are trivial mentions or promotional pieces/press releases. To the credit of the page creator, however, I don't think they have a conflict of interest, as they've been working on other pages for various Indian publishing houses. Nanophosis (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 08:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly scrapes into GNG range but fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH; per nom, many sources cited are either trivial mentions in passing or are not independent from the subject. In addition, no in-depth knowledge of the company is provided by the sources cited and the company has (and makes) no real claims to encyclopedic significance.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Its on the verge of Keep and Delete. Mia Watson (talk) 16:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.