Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half Serious


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. postdlf (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Half Serious

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

abg 03:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Lack of rationale. (The same editor also flagged this article about a film as a BLP.) There is press coverage today about a court case regarding this film, which may go some way to evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 07:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've stubbifyed the article due to extensive copyvio problems, and added some refs. Given that the nominator marked the article for speedy deletion under invalid criteria, sent it to AfD without giving a rationale, and then added a series of inapplicable maintenance tags, all in the space of a couple of minutes, I think we can speedy close this as a bad-faith, or at least misguided, nomination. DoctorKubla (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.