Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halifax Vandals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Halifax Vandals

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very low league rugby club which fails WP:GNG, my WP:BEFORE search brought up very few secondary sources, such as , none of which can really support any of the text in the article. SportingFlyer  T · C  08:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  08:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer  T · C  08:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non-notable rugby union club. There's mentions online, but not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. As far as I'm aware the club haven't produced an international player so fails WP:RU/N as well. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:54, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, just like the rest of the teams that compete in the ninth tier of English rugby Dexxtrall (talk) 17:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable, no indepth coverage. 1друг (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.