Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall effect sensor

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was 4 to keep, 1 to merge and the delete vote by the nominator withdrawn. Sounds like a clear keep Sjakkalle 15:38, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hall effect sensor
Delete Keep. Not an actual article, but an explanation of why the article should not merely be a redirect to another article. Nothing salvagable in history, either. Android79 22:19, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep and clean up (and I'll work on that tonight). Let's treat this one as the misplaced article request that it was, and fulfill it. --iMb~Mw 04:56, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC) (and yes, that will include cleaning up Hall effect).
 * Merge into Hall effect. -- RHaworth 07:34, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
 * That was quick! Thanks to iMb, this is now an actual stub, so I withdraw my VfD nomination. Android79 07:45, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well done iMb. The article looks good.Capitalistroadster 19:07, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, though this vote may be a moot point anyway. Great stuff! - Lucky 6.9 08:23, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)