Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallie Meyers-Shyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hallie Meyers-Shyer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject who fails WP:NACTOR and WP:DIRECTOR. Note that notability is not inherited from the subject's notable family members. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment could be notable but author is failed to put the article as per standards. Must enhance the structure and add reliable sources Chrisswill (talk) 20:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to draft to give the article time to collect sources. bd2412  T 04:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. She is the focus of a feature in yesterday's Los Angeles Times. She's the director of a major new film. Of course the coverage mentions her parents but it's about her and her project. Time to get on with improving the article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow keep. Yes, first film and all, but she's literally all over everything as a result: THR, NYT, LAT, WSJ, etc. NOTINHERITED is dead for this one. ATS (talk) 06:46, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: may I present this xfd as a textbook example of why we have maintenance tags, as opposed to making noms 2.25 hours after an article is created? Yes, it had the same effect, but even the most rudimentary of news searches quickly proved the subject notable. ATS (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:PROMO lacking credible sources and body of work to be notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EC Racing (talk • contribs) 20:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. The subject is a film director whose debut film was released into 2,940 theaters just this past weekend. I have added some more information to the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep -- a director of a major Hollywood feature, Home Again (2017 film). Combined with her movie roles, passes WP:CREATIVE in my eyes. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep has reliable sources sig cov so passes WP:GNG as well as WP:ENT Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep and stub, per the new film. Nice to be on the same side as K.e.coffman for a change! This might be a first. ;-) TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  21:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.