Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallowicked


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Making accusations against the nominator is not a reason to keep an article. --Core desat  06:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Hallowicked

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet notability requirements. ↪Lakes (Talk) 20:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Lakes for some reason dislikes me, and is trying to delete all articles I have started, I say dismiss this idea of deletion. Also, this article was just started, so I think it should be given time to develop.
 * Delete non-notable wrestler. JuJube 01:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not asserted. -- Charlene 02:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Close - This article was created on the 5th of January, giving editors just over a week to assert notability in an article that is by any measure a stub. I'm not saying it should be kept or deleted, I'm saying that the AfD nomination itself was done entirely too quickly.  (Immediatism at its worst, I fear)  It's far too soon to nominate an article for deletion under WP:N.  Tag it and give editors a reasonable chance to fix the problem; then you can AfD it. -- Y  &#124;  yukichigai (ramble argue check) 11:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Why would it have to be given time when the person isn't obviously notable enough yet for inclusion? "Article is new" is a weak reason to keep it.
 * ↪Lakes (Talk) 12:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable minor league wrestler. Would suggest Kris Classic spends more time finding reliable sources that assert notability before creating articles, rather than attacking people who nominate the articles. One Night In Hackney 14:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.