Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaloGen (game mod)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

HaloGen (game mod)
Unfinished game mod falls under Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, especially given the number of fan-made projects that are never finished. Advertisement, non-notable. Prod removed by apparent SPA. -- Merope 13:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Content of article would be good for a blog or website but Wikipedia is not a place to advertise or promote an unreleased MOD. -- DrunkenSmurf 13:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's crystal balling at its finest, and chances are that the game won't be notable even upon being released. The infobox is particularly amusing. -- Kicking222 14:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - the game's not even finished yet, and there's no indication of popularity, and yet it already has a Wikipedia article? If it becomes wildly popular (like CounterStrike, for instance) then an article can be rewritten. For now, it falls under "non-notable". –-  kungming·  2 |  (Talk ·Contact) 15:34, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, spam, crystal ball. Off with the head. --Mecanismo | Talk 17:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, unless references are included that substantiate notability, then maybe, if you can find me, I'll change my vote. Addhoc 18:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I have no problem in principle with listing mods, btu they need to be important or famous ones and unreleased mods are rarely either. Ace of Sevens 00:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.