Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo (2009 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Halo (series). Although it is not at all clear if the movie will still be released in 2009 (or ever), It's not at all unlikely that this will be used as a search term for a quite a while. Even after 2009, it might be used as a search term based on the IMDb article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Halo (2009 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article warrants deletion because it contains no sources and a portion of the content is merely a word for word copy of the material found at Halo (series). There is no new evidence that the film has gone back into production or is at least no longer cancelled, aside from a currently removed linked to a YouTube fan video which seemed to be the original basis for creating the article. As such, there is no indication at this time that the movie will ever be made, let alone be ready for a 2009 release (which is why a simple redirect would be impractical), and so the article isn't needed. -- Comandante    { Talk }  17:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Deltete per nom.  Black  ngold29   17:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

-- I can't help but agree, I recently edited out the youtube link, but having read the material found at Halo (series), I believe there is no particular need for this article for the time being. Perhaps if the film is continued and more information is brought into light then a seperate page could be warranted. But in the meantime I say bin it. - Deathbycheesedrum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathbycheesedrum (talk • contribs) 18:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Halo (series) - this has a long way to go before anything is even close to verifiable --T-rex 18:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and WP:NFF. JohnCD (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above.... since we won't see Master Chief in big screen anytime soon. SYSS Mouse (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Halo (series) tabor -drop me a line 21:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the notability guidelines for future films; this has been stuck in development hell for a long, long time, and there is zero guarantee that it will ever begin production. The "Film adaptation" section suffices. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 00:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment- For those here who have opted in favor of the redirect, I must remind you that I do not believe that is the best option. What if the movie never comes out in 2009? There would be no point in searching for a Halo movie that was released in 2009 then, because none would exist. To avoid any confusion or premature assumptions about the movie's release, the article would be better off deleted. If it has to be recreated, it will be, but there is no point in having a redirect no one is likely to use or that would be inaccurate. -- Comandante    { Talk }  17:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per T-rex. --SkyWalker (talk) 09:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree that it is an unlikely search target so redirecting it won't be useful. Halo (film) and Halo film already redirect to the relevant section so I think that they suffice. It was supposed to be released in 2008, not 2009 anyway so the title is misleading. James086 Talk &#124;  Email 15:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT ukexpat (talk) 02:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. A "salt" until the end of the year would be appropriate. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 02:42, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.