Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo Technology Holdings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Halo Technology Holdings

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

They do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Daringsmith (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a one-sentence stub with zero sourcing as to why this company is notable.TH1980 (talk) 04:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The article fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. -Imcdc (talk) 12:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to find sources that meet NCORP criteria.  HighKing++ 21:28, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete might be notable due to being public, but since no sources provided and above editors unable to find anything, then I vote delete. Chelokabob (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Unbh (talk) 12:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not a single source provided, I can find a few press releases and reports from data aggregators, but nothing independent or in-depth. Anton.bersh (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.