Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamad bin Khalifa Al Nahyan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft Deletion. As power~enwiki doesn't specifically register opposition to this article's deletion but is hardly a ringing endorser of it, I think the best option in these circumstances is to treat it as if it were a regular non-participating AfD nom.

As with any soft deletion, this can be recreated on request either to me or WP:REFUND. Nosebagbear (talk) 00:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Hamad bin Khalifa Al Nahyan
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am submitting this for discussion again, since the time has passed, the sale did not happen and the whole story now looks like one big scam. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:04, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * What, exactly, is a scam here? Are you saying that his claiming to be a member of the Abu Dhabi Royal Family is fraudulent?  Or is some business deal he was involved in engaging in fraud? User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 20:31, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Read the news sources, mentioned in the article. There is no ANY mention of him as part of Abu Dhabi Royal Family beside the articles about Beitar deal, which was canceled due to his "wealth" not being a real wealth. He is not mentioned in any source in Arabic or English, which is a very suspicious, taking account that members of a Royal Family are always in spotlight. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * There is certainly something strange going on here. I think the incident with Beitar Jerusalem is notable enough to be discussed somewhere beyond Beitar Jerusalem F.C., but the article as-written has so many problems there's an argument for deletion based on WP:TNT or WP:BLP violations. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 20:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Bold third relist to try and ascertain consensus on this BLP.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:44, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.